|
|
Post by Green Bay Packers GM (Mike) on Jun 10, 2014 14:38:54 GMT -5
Eddy Lacy and pick 85
For
Jamal Charles and pick 87
|
|
|
|
Post by Green Bay Packers GM (Mike) on Jun 10, 2014 14:40:59 GMT -5
I accept because I want to win now and Charles is an upgrade for this season
|
|
|
|
Post by Kansas City Chiefs GM (Dylan) on Jun 10, 2014 14:42:10 GMT -5
Accept. Charles may be the better back at the moment, but I'm thinking long term with this trade. I love Lacy's style and what he brings to the Green Bay offense. He is a very welcome addition to the Chiefs and thanks for the quick and easy discussion, Mike.
|
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles GM (Chris) on Jun 10, 2014 21:41:39 GMT -5
Pass (1-0)
I have no argument for this trade other than I wanted Charles, but that doesn't help this trade go through. Good deal guys!
|
|
|
|
Post by Oakland Raiders GM (Zack) on Jun 10, 2014 22:57:49 GMT -5
Pass (2-0)
No need to veto. Jmail is a beat tho
|
|
|
|
Post by Houston Texans GM (Luke) on Jun 10, 2014 23:22:59 GMT -5
Pass (3-0)
I'm not so sure Charles outscores Lacy in 2014, but to each their own.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pittsburgh Steelers GM (Noah) on Jun 11, 2014 6:49:10 GMT -5
Pass (4-0)
Definite a matter of debate on who might help a team "win now," but I guess I'll trust the Packers to know who's better for them!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2014 12:31:06 GMT -5
Loks like a fairly even trade. I can understand the wanting to win now philosophy as well as wanting to build for the future. Good trade. Pass (5-0)
|
|
