|
Host Site
Jul 2, 2014 8:03:50 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Minnesota Vikings GM (Tyler) on Jul 2, 2014 8:03:50 GMT -5
I was bored so I did some asking around about a free fantasy site that can hold a league for 32 teams.
There's quite a few that you have to pay a fee.
But Fantrax can do this for free. I know we've set up the ESPN sites and that's where most (or all) of the recruiting of owners took place.
Just thought I'd throw the idea out there to use Fantrax. I've never before used the site, so I can't tell you much about it. It states it's fully customizable to any league specifics though.
I just think there will be less confusion to have all teams under one league. It could also make the possibility of inter-conference play more easily achieved.
I have no problem keeping it the way it is on ESPN, but I just thought I'd throw this idea out there when there's still time to set up everything.
If anyone has thoughts on this, please share them.
|
|
|
Host Site
Jul 2, 2014 8:20:00 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Miami Dolphins GM (David) on Jul 2, 2014 8:20:00 GMT -5
I did 32 team dynasty in fantrax for 5 years. It works pretty good. If you don't do the chat it's free which the chat is a nice feature I can live with out it.
|
|
|
Post by Philadelphia Eagles GM (Chris) on Jul 2, 2014 9:27:26 GMT -5
Ive never used it, so Im interested in seeing what it looks like and how it can be used. I wouldnt mind using Fantrax instead of ESPN especially since it would allow inter-cnference play. We'll see what Greg says. Thanks Tyler!
|
|
|
Post by Houston Texans GM (Luke) on Jul 2, 2014 9:38:47 GMT -5
I personally support ANY effort to get out of ESPN. If the features that Tyler mentions are true (and I have no reason to believe they aren't), we should run, not walk, to a different interface.
|
|
|
Host Site
Jul 2, 2014 12:38:48 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Kansas City Chiefs GM (Dylan) on Jul 2, 2014 12:38:48 GMT -5
If it can host a 32 team league without using two different leagues, I see no reason not to go for it.
|
|
|
Host Site
Jul 2, 2014 13:19:04 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Miami Dolphins GM (David) on Jul 2, 2014 13:19:04 GMT -5
If it can host a 32 team league without using two different leagues, I see no reason not to go for it. Fantrax can defiantly run all 32 Teams. I was in 5 dynasty leagues there. All had all 32 teams and followed the nfl scheduals.
|
|
|
Host Site
Jul 2, 2014 20:41:03 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Cleveland Browns GM (Greg) on Jul 2, 2014 20:41:03 GMT -5
I have no expirience with fantrax whatsoever, but if it's as good as everyone is saying that it is I say we give it a shot. It just might take some figuring out, but it would be worth it to have all teams in one league
|
|
|
Post by Arizona Cardinals GM (Sam) on Jul 3, 2014 0:53:47 GMT -5
Agreed, Greg will you set it up?
|
|
|
Post by Cleveland Browns GM (Greg) on Jul 3, 2014 7:35:23 GMT -5
Sure, I'll give it a shot here today!
|
|
|
Host Site
Jul 3, 2014 8:12:13 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Miami Dolphins GM (David) on Jul 3, 2014 8:12:13 GMT -5
I never did a set up but have used the system. Would be way better then trying to do two separate leagues for sure.
|
|